Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aviad Cohen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:21, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aviad Cohen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:MUSICBIO. Four self-released albums and no charting history. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:58, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:19, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Agree Jpacobb (talk) 01:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as failing WP:MUSICBIO. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:08, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious keep! he surely passes GNG as well as the first point in WP:MUSICBIO (also under his previous name, 50 Shekel), and deletion-nominators and voting editors should spend a few minutes of searches before marking a subject as non-notable. Several sources: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Cavarrone (talk) 19:16, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:08, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Per many of the sources presented above by User:Cavarrone, this person clearly passes WP:BASIC and WP:GNG. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:05, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:MUSICBIO #1 which is basically WP:GNG, per search results from Cavarrone and my own search results. Article is currently under-sourced but should be kept and improved per WP:PRESERVE, I'll put it on my own 'stuff to do' list for later. Zad68 12:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.